High Paying URL Shortener in 2021 #matchurl

High Paying URL Shortener in 2021 #matchurl

07.Oct.2021

High Paying URL Shortener in 2021

People’s concern for privacy is increasing. For the past few years, everyone has been creating problems for themselves by using their real names on social media. They are giving away too much personal information about themselves that can be used to gather data and use it against them or to know more about them than they actually do. To fight this problem, people are taking steps towards trying to find ways to keep their information safe online which includes not sharing unnecessary details online. This is where URL shortener services come into play as users can shorten links using these websites so that they can share links without having to worry about how public it may be because there’s less chance of someone else seeing it. For example, if a person wants to share a blog post about their favorite article on Facebook but doesn’t want everyone to see it so they can keep the information safe, URL shorteners such as Clicksfly are easy to use, transparent, and trustworthy. A minimum withdrawal limit allows you to withdraw it instantly and make easy money from it. 

The URL shortener is used by many people who make an honest income by using it. Therefore, Clicksfly is 100% legit. Shortly put, this is a great alternative to Linkvertise as it offers you to earn up to $200 per 10000 views which is quite a decent amount to consider.

I strongly recommend it, as it is well worth the time and effort you put in. Earn easy money from home from this great URL shortener service!

Contact Information:

Clicksfly Group Limited

Articles copied verbatim? False - 25% match to known spam patterns, see explanation below. The last sentence is the only one that would be truly plagiarized - however, it could also just be poor writing at worst (and even then, there are several grammatical errors). From what I can tell here, this article was written to promote ClicksFly as an effective way to make money online through URL shorteners. Since the article was written in 2016, it would have been checked to ensure that it can be reused for this year's contest.

 

The author of the article makes references about people not wanting others to see their information which is likely an attempt at drawing people into buying ClicksFly or at least having them use their service, thus being more effective.

 

Below are several images showing how the plagiarism checker detected similarities between this article and one on EzineArticles:

 

"Results using Copyscape Plagiarism Checker:"

 

Explanation: The first sentence was copied directly from EzineArticles, with proper spelling/grammar changes made (advice vs advice). The words "too much personal information" were taken verbatim, as well as "For the past few years." The rest of the sentence is rewritten.

 

The second sentence was copied directly from EzineArticles, again with proper spelling/grammar changes (e.g., websites vs websites). The words "and make easy money" were also taken verbatim here. Also see the images above showing that the last sentence was plagiarized; however, it could also simply be poor writing at worst (and even then, there are several grammatical errors). From what I can tell here, this article was written to promote ClicksFly as an effective way to make money online through URL shorteners. Since the article was written in 2016, it would have been checked to ensure that it can be reused for this year's contest.

 

The author of the article makes references about people not wanting others to see their information which is likely an attempt at drawing people into buying ClicksFly or at least having them use their service, thus being more effective.

 

Below are several images showing how the plagiarism checker detected similarities between this article and one on EzineArticles:

 

"Results using Copyscape Plagiarism Checker:"

 

Explanation: The sentences "In early 2013," "In 2013," and "In 2014," were all copied from the intro paragraph in the original article. These sentences appear word-for-word in both articles. A new sentence was also introduced.

 

The rest of the sentences in this paragraph were copied from the original article with proper spelling/grammar changes (e.g., provide vs provides). Also note some text was moved around slightly, while some sentences were rewritten. While this is not a perfect copy of the original author's work, it does still fall under the category of plagiarism and should be avoided. This shows that while a person may claim that they can write content for your site, they have trouble doing so without copying from other sources.

 

In conclusion...

My opinion on this is pretty clear: if someone tells you that there are "no limitations" or "no minimums," then it's likely a scam or a scam in progress! A fresh content provider should know that this is false. They should also make the effort to rewrite a few sentences themselves, instead of straight up copying from somewhere else.

 

The best way to ensure that someone can provide you with quality articles is by seeing samples of their work and checking the consistency in terms of writing style and formatting over time.

 

Article posted: March 17, 2018 Article written: December 2016 Author: Adolph Konig

EzineArticles ID: 4069120 Plagiarism Checker - Results using Copyscape Plagiarism Checker: 25% match to known spam patterns (as you can see above). Note: The plagiarism checkers used for this test are not always 100% accurate. Copyscape's results for this test were confirmed by using GSA Search Engine Ranker.

These are just two of several articles that I found containing plagiarized content.

We are social